Skip to content

Legal practices

Intake is not admin. It is the practice.

Megan answers every call to your firm, takes the details you tell her to take, and gets qualified callers onto your calendar — including the ones who ring at nine on a Friday night.

Your voicemail box is empty on Monday morning. That is the problem.

Most firms read an empty voicemail box as a quiet weekend. It is not. Pull your call log next to it and the two will not agree, because in legal the missed call leaves no trace at all — no message, no web form, no enquiry to review, nothing to add to a list.

Here is what happened instead. On Saturday afternoon someone finally worked themselves up to the thing they had been putting off for three weeks. They had rehearsed a version of it in the shower. They dialled your number with their heart going, got a recording, and the resolve did not survive the beep. They hung up.

They did not call back. Not because your firm was rejected — they never got far enough to form a view of your firm. The decision they had made was "I am going to call a lawyer today," and the moment somebody answered anywhere, that decision was discharged. The firm that got them did nothing cleverer than pick up.

This is what makes legal different from ordinary businesses. In most industries a missed call is a delayed sale; you call back on Tuesday and you are still in the running. In law it is a completed sale for somebody else, and it is invisible. A firm can lose a meaningful share of its potential caseload over a year without a single artefact of it appearing anywhere in the office.

Which is why intake is not the administrative function that supports the practice. For most firms it is the constraint on the practice — the ceiling on how much work comes in — and it is decided entirely by whether the phone gets answered by a person who knows what to do next.

The specific pages for personal injury, family, immigration, estate planning and criminal defence go deeper into what that looks like in each. This one is about the thing they all share.

The calls

Most of your line is not new matters, and that is the first problem

A firm's number carries at least eight different conversations. Sorting them correctly is most of what good intake does, and it is the part an answering service cannot do at all.

Captures the lead

The first-time caller with the whole story

Nervous, rehearsed, and frequently telling you everything before anyone has asked a question — because they have been holding it for weeks. What they need first is to be heard for ninety seconds and then told plainly what happens next.

Transfers

The existing client chasing an update

They want their attorney, not a form. Being asked to describe their matter again by the firm handling it is how a good client starts quietly wondering whether anyone is actually reading their file.

Screens

The matter you do not take

Every firm gets calls for practice areas it does not handle. A fast, kind, honest no costs a minute and buys real goodwill; a callback three days later to say the same thing costs the caller three days they did not have.

Takes a message

Opposing counsel or the court

Procedural, time-bound, unmistakable once you know what to listen for. A clerk's call sitting in a general voicemail box over a weekend is the kind of thing that produces a bad Monday.

Captures the lead

The referral from another lawyer

A colleague sending work over. The most valuable call a firm gets and the most damaging to fumble, because the referrer finds out how it went and adjusts accordingly.

Takes a message

The records or subpoena request

Administrative, deadline-driven, and completely unlike a new matter despite arriving on the same number. Routing it to the right paralegal is the entire job.

Answers

"I just have a quick question"

A real call from a real person, and one that must be handled without giving anything that could be mistaken for legal advice. Done well it becomes a consultation; done badly it becomes a complaint.

Screens

The vendor and the lead reseller

Legal marketing is a crowded industry and your number is on every list ever compiled. Screening these out returns a measurable amount of an attorney's week.

The daytime problem is different from the evening problem

During office hours the issue is not that nobody answers — it is that the person answering is doing four other things. A small firm's receptionist runs the calendar, greets people in the lobby, prepares documents and covers the phones, and calls arriving during a busy stretch go to voicemail from a fully staffed office. That is not a performance problem. One person cannot be on two calls.

Evenings and weekends are where it gets stark. People decide to call a lawyer when they finally have quiet: after work, on a Sunday afternoon, in the small hours after something went wrong. Those callers have the strongest intent and the shortest patience of anyone who will ring your firm all week, and for most practices they reach a recording.

The conventional answer is a legal answering service, and it has two failures that matter. The first is that it takes a name and a number, so every call has to be worked again the next morning by somebody starting from nothing — and by then a share of those callers have retained elsewhere. The second is audible: the caller can tell within one sentence that they have not reached the firm. For somebody already anxious about whether a lawyer will take them seriously, that is a poor opening impression, and it is the impression they carry into the callback.

Megan answers in your firm's name at the same standard at eleven at night as at eleven in the morning, and asks the questions you told her to ask rather than reading a generic script. Whether that is worth having is not really a question you can settle by reading — the forwarding takes a minute to set up and a minute to remove, which is the point of trying it on a weekend.

Work it out on your own matter values

Take the average value of a matter of the kind you actually want more of — not a blended figure across the whole practice, because an estate plan, a contested custody matter and a contingency case are not the same number and averaging them tells you nothing useful.

Now the harder figure: how many first-time callers did not reach a person last month. Most firms have never measured it, because the evidence of a missed legal call is precisely nothing. Your phone provider can give you inbound against connected, broken out by hour. Ask for the evenings and weekends specifically — that is where it concentrates.

Multiply, then be pessimistic on purpose. Assume most were unqualified, wrong practice area, or people who were never going to retain. Halve what remains. Whatever survives that is real, and in legal the residue is usually large, because a single retained matter can exceed a year of what answering the phone costs.

There is a second effect that never shows up in that arithmetic and is worth more over a decade. Referral is how most firms actually grow, and referrals come from clients who felt looked after — an impression that begins on the first call, before any legal work has been done. A firm that is reachable at nine on a Sunday evening is remembered as a firm that was there, and that memory is what gets repeated at a dinner table two years later.

One piece of published research is worth knowing here, and worth handling carefully. Harvard Business Review's audit of 2,241 U.S. companies found 23% never responded to an inbound enquiry at all, and that among those that did respond within 30 days the average took 42 hours; a separate study of 1.25 million leads found that firms making contact within an hour were nearly seven times as likely to reach a decision maker as those waiting an hour longer. That research is about web enquiries and outbound follow-up at ordinary businesses. It is not about law firms and not about answering a ringing phone, so treat it as general evidence that responsiveness decides who gets the conversation — not as a claim about legal intake. What it does corroborate is the thing every managing partner has already observed: the caller does not wait.

Against that, answering is billed by the second Megan is actually on a call. A quiet week costs almost nothing. There is no seat to fund whether the phone rings or not, which is what makes round-the-clock coverage arithmetically possible for a two-attorney firm rather than only for the practices with a billboard budget.

  1. 23% of 2,241 audited U.S. companies never responded to an inbound enquiry; average response time among those that did was 42 hours; contact within an hour was nearly 7x as likely to reach a decision maker as contact an hour later. Oldroyd, McElheran & Elkington, “The Short Life of Online Sales Leads,” Harvard Business Review, March 2011

Pay As You Go is $29 a month plus $0.88 for each minute Megan spends on calls, with no included minutes. Professional is $199 a month and includes 500 minutes, then $0.45 a minute. Growth is $499 a month and includes 1,500 minutes, then $0.38 a minute. Enterprise is priced by conversation. Every plan includes the entire product — the plans differ by included minutes only — and calls are billed in real seconds, never rounded up to the next minute.

Example call

An example call

Friday, 9:20pm. A first-time caller has been putting this off for weeks.

Example call9:20 PM · Friday
  1. Megan

    Thank you for calling Harding & Vance, this is Megan, an AI assistant. How can I help you this evening?

  2. Caller

    I got a letter from my landlord saying they're starting eviction and I don't really know what to do. I've been meaning to call someone all week.

  3. Megan

    I'm glad you called. I can't give you legal advice, but I can get you in front of one of our attorneys. Does the letter have a date on it — a deadline or a court date?

  4. Caller

    There's a date, the 14th. It says I have to respond by then.

  5. Megan

    That's the detail they'll want first. We have consultation slots Monday morning — would ten o'clock work? I'll take your name and number and make sure they have the date before you come in.

  6. Caller

    Monday at ten is fine. It's Dana Whitfield.

Consultation booked for Monday 10am, with the deadline of the 14th flagged in the email — so the attorney knows the clock before the client walks in.Megan, the AI receptionist

An illustration of how Megan handles this kind of call, not a recording of one. Her opening line is the disclosure she actually speaks.

How it fits

How this sits alongside the way a firm already works

1

Existing clients never get an intake script

The first thing Megan establishes is whether a caller is new. An existing client asking about their matter is transferred or has a message taken for their attorney — never run through qualification. Nothing erodes a legal relationship faster than being treated as a stranger by the firm holding your file.

2

You define what qualifies, and she asks exactly that

The questions that decide whether a matter is worth a consultation differ between practice areas and often between two firms in the same one. You supply them. She asks them. That is the whole difference between an intake and a message, and it is why a generic legal script is worse than useless.

3

Consultations go onto the calendar during the call

The gap between a caller's resolve and a booked appointment is where firms lose matters, and it is measured in minutes rather than days. Booking while they are still on the line closes it. You set which slots are available for consultations and she fills those and nothing else.

4

Wrong-practice-area calls get a clean, immediate answer

If you do not do criminal work, a criminal caller should hear that in the first minute rather than after a week of phone tag. If you keep a referral list, she can point them at it. The fastest way to become the firm other lawyers refer to is to be the firm that refers well.

5

The evening's intake reads in four minutes

Transcript, recording and summary by email per call. An attorney can go through Friday night's calls over coffee on Saturday and decide which one to ring first, which is a different thing entirely from listening to voicemails.

What Megan is, and what she is not

Megan is a receptionist. She answers the phone, screens, takes the information your firm asks her to take, books consultations and transfers calls. She does not give legal advice, does not evaluate the merits of a matter, does not quote fees, and does not tell a caller whether they have a case.

She does not run a conflicts check. That is your firm's process and it stays your firm's process — she collects the names a check needs, and the check is run by the people responsible for it.

We do not represent that a call handled by Megan is privileged or confidential in the professional sense, and no page on this site will tell you otherwise. Attorney-client privilege, the duty of confidentiality, and what your jurisdiction and your carrier require of an intake process are matters for your firm to evaluate against your own obligations — including what a prospective client is told, what is recorded, and where it is stored. We will answer any question about how the system works so you can make that assessment properly. What we will not do is make it for you or offer a warranty in place of it.

Firms handling particularly sensitive matters commonly limit what Megan collects on a first call — enough to identify the caller and book a consultation, no more, with the substance left for the attorney. That is worth deciding deliberately before you go live rather than discovering afterwards that you would have preferred it.

Questions

Law Firms: the questions we get asked

Won't callers be put off by an AI answering a law firm?
It is the objection worth taking seriously, and the honest answer has two parts. First, Megan says she is an AI assistant in her opening sentence — no impersonation, nothing to discover later. Almost all the resentment people carry toward these systems comes from being fooled and then finding out, and the disclosure removes it. Second, the comparison that matters is the one actually on offer at nine on a Friday night. It is not a warm receptionist; your receptionist went home at five. It is a recording, and a caller who reaches a recording does not leave a message — they call the next firm. Someone frightened about an eviction letter wants to be heard and told when a lawyer will speak to them. Getting that in two minutes from an AI who is upfront about being one beats getting a beep. Where these systems do lose people is when they cannot understand a caller and will not transfer to a human, which is a matter of how you configure the transfer rules.
Will Megan give legal advice to a caller?
No. She is built to say plainly that she cannot advise on a matter and to move the caller toward someone who can. This is a firm constraint rather than a question of tone: an intake conversation that strays into advice creates a problem for the firm regardless of who said it. So she captures the facts you have asked for and books the consultation. Callers accept it readily — most of them expected it, and being told clearly what happens next is what they actually rang for.
Is a call handled by Megan privileged or confidential?
We make no such representation, and you should be wary of any answering service that does. Megan is a receptionist who answers your line, takes details and books appointments. Whether a particular intake arrangement satisfies your obligations around privilege, confidentiality and client communications depends on your jurisdiction, your practice area, your professional-responsibility rules and your carrier's requirements — and it is a judgment your firm has to make. We will explain exactly how the system handles calls, what is recorded, what is transcribed and where it goes, so you can evaluate it properly. Many firms choose to have Megan collect only identifying details and a scheduling slot, leaving the substance of a matter for the attorney.
Can she tell an existing client from a new caller?
Yes, and it is the first thing she establishes. An existing client is transferred or has a message taken for their attorney, and is never put through intake questions. This matters more in legal than in almost any other industry: a client already anxious about their matter who gets asked to explain it from scratch by the firm representing them draws a conclusion about how closely their case is being followed, and it is not a favourable one.
Can she run a conflicts check?
No, and she should not. A conflicts check is a professional obligation belonging to the firm, and automating it is not something we would offer. What Megan does is collect the information one needs — the caller's name, the names of the other parties as the caller gives them, and the nature of the matter — so that whoever runs the check has it before the consultation rather than at it.
What happens when someone calls about a practice area we do not handle?
They are told, kindly and immediately. Megan knows which matters your firm takes, and a caller with something outside that hears so on the first call rather than after leaving a message returned three days later with a no. If you keep a list of firms you refer out to, she can pass it on. This is worth more than it looks: a caller who was genuinely helped in ninety seconds remembers it, and the reciprocity between firms that refer well is how a good deal of legal work actually moves.
How does she handle opposing counsel, courts and records requests?
As what they are — procedural calls with deadlines, not new business. Megan identifies them, takes the matter reference and the substance of the request, and routes them the way you specify, including straight to a particular attorney or paralegal. The failure mode she exists to prevent is a court call sitting in a general voicemail box over a weekend.
Can she quote our fees or explain our contingency terms?
She can state facts you have given her — that a consultation is complimentary, for instance, or that a particular kind of matter is handled on contingency — but she does not quote amounts or explain terms. Fee discussions have consequences and they belong with an attorney. What she does instead is remove the reason a caller usually asks: she tells them when they will speak to someone, which is very often the reassurance the fee question was standing in for.
Does she text clients?
No. Megan works over the phone, and the record of every call — transcript, recording and summary — reaches you by email. Text messaging is not part of the product yet. Given how much legal client communication now happens by text, that is worth knowing before you sign up rather than after.

Somebody is deciding to call a lawyer tonight.

Pay As You Go is $29 a month plus $0.88 for each minute Megan spends on calls, with no included minutes. Professional is $199 a month and includes 500 minutes, then $0.45 a minute. Growth is $499 a month and includes 1,500 minutes, then $0.38 a minute. Enterprise is priced by conversation. Every plan includes the entire product — the plans differ by included minutes only — and calls are billed in real seconds, never rounded up to the next minute.

Start Capturing Missed Calls →